Intelligence versus Smarts

animal, ape, black
PublicDomainPictures (CC0), Pixabay

Not many people realize that they can learn anything; they think it requires a high IQ to attain certain knowledge; that simply isn’t true. Being smart is something completely different, and there are more people that are smart then are intelligent.

Take for example something as difficult as paying your bills on time. Smart people know there are penalties involved in paying late, so they pay on time, people with high IQ’s have the highest debt load, maybe they spend to much time trying to think of ways to come up with the money.

The misunderstanding that it is more important to have a higher IQ, then to use more common sense comes from those who not only have a high IQ, but have learned to use it wisely, they are also smart. Einstein, Steven Hawkins, and others have had the same problems as the rest of us; they just came to the answers faster, and also had the smarts to publish their results.

Students with high IQs fail more classes and subjects in middle and high schools, then those with below average rates. There are two reasons for this; the first main reason is that the pace of the lessons is so slow it literally bores the teen to tears. The second reason it that having a high IQ doesn’t mean you’ll develop good social skills, logic and reason have little to do with empathy, and you need that to create a network of friends. School can be a lonely place for someone who the rest don’t understand.

It is likely that your own boss has a lower IQ score then yourself, but remember, he is likely also smarter, you are the one doing the work. It takes more then a high IQ to learn certain things, not everything can be absorbed into the grey matter via a book. Practical know comes from years of hands on work, you just can not learn that you need to twist the handle of a pipe binder just so in order not to kink the pipe.

Imagine that an IQ test measures is the same as an acceleration test for a car. The better the engine can convert energy to speed the faster the car can go, an old clunker will still make it from Vancouver to Toronto, but the sports car will get there faster. IQ works the same way, if you score below average on an IQ test, you can still learn what you need to know to be an engineer, and the person that has a high IQ will just learn it faster then you.

Survey Says

checklist, check, list
TeroVesalainen (CC0), Pixabay

I get target fixated. If I need to find the answer to a question, I hunt it down ruthlessly. I simply don’t stop till I know what the whole answer is. I think this is what started my book collection. I enjoy co-op radio (www.coopradio.org), but I must confess that it isn’t the radio station I listen to via my alarm clock. I have a crappy radio alarm, and haven’t found one at the thrift store yet that can get co-op like my stereo in the living room, (or via the Internet). So when I set up the alarm clock I choose the channel closest to co-op I could get, hoping to fine tune it later. Well, it turns out this channel (which I won’t name, partly due to not wanting to advertise them) has an “Impossible Question” every morning. The object is, they ask a question, and callers try to phone in the correct answer to get a prize.

The result for me is that I can not fall back to sleep because I need to know the answer. But awhile ago I noticed the question being asked were useless as far as knowledge goes. They were all survey results which didn’t really help further improve mankind’s place in the world. I mean, who cares whether or not guys like red or pink lipstick anyway?

Being a researcher myself, I’ve done many surveys which have at their core a purpose. Public opinion polls might tell us which Liberal, or Conservative moron might win the next election, but education surveys will tell us why people are not making smart choices with the environment. The problem with surveys is the way some research companies load the questions.

When I have a conversation with someone it has at it’s core context. You know what I am talking about when I ask you a question because we’ve been sitting in the coffee shop for the last hour getting buzzed off of java beans. Paul Lazarsfeld (1935), who wrote one of the earliest papers on research interviewing would call this “the flow of ordinary discourse”. Without such a discourse, the context is tilted, sometimes towards where the researchers want it to go. If I walk up to you on the street and suddenly ask you if you think that Chlorofluorocarbons are the leading cause of Global Warming, you may answer with a yes, or a no. You might ask what the heck is a Chlorofluorowhatchamacallit. (emissions from the use of fossil fuels). Note however, I never asked you if you believed that Global Warming was a real problem. If I did, maybe I could also find out why you drive that SUV.

Multiple choice is the same thing…

Which do you think is the leading cause of Lung Cancer?

1: Smoking
2: Smog
3: GMO’s
4: Pesticides
5: Radiation from Microwaves, Cell phones, & Power Lines

Although, smoking really is the leading cause of lung cancer, did you know that radon is the second?

Radon is considered to be the second leading cause of lung cancer in the U.S. today. Radon gas can come up through the soil under a home or building and enter through gaps and cracks in the foundation or insulation, as well as through pipes, drains, walls or other openings. Radon causes between 15,000 and 22,000 lung cancer deaths each year in the United States — 12 percent of all lung cancer deaths are linked to radon.” – Facts About Lung Cancer November 20, 2006 American Lung Assoc.

You have to be careful in asking question when doing research, it effects the outcome. That is why the scientific community encourages peer review. Even when the only research involved is done complete in a lab, it still requires the peer review, because to put it plainly, sometimes we ask ourselves the wrong questions.

Just something to think about the next time that phone rings with a survey on the other end, you may want to ask a few questions yourself. Who are they taking the survey for? Who will get the results? And most important, who is paying for it?

-Wolfe

Thank You Adriane Carr

concept, man, papers
Pexels (CC0), Pixabay

I get to have some fun. There are three types of gifts that really make me jump up and take notice. First, there is the whole wolf thing, I have a wolf coffee cup, t-shirts with wolves on them, and about a million wolves done in cross-stitch by my wife. I collect anything to do with them, it is what I get for xmas, birthdays, etc, and am very happy with this. The second thing that I like getting are non-fiction books, anything non-fiction, history, politics, and many many how-to’s fill my attic walls where my desk sits as I write this, I guess it comes with the territory of writing reports, and doing research, always nice to have that book you need right here at hand, rather then running downtown to the library.

Raw research, and reports are by far the best gift I get.

I went downtown yesterday to attend a FreeGeek meeting, and ended up having to leave a tad bit early to help out some friends. I knew the Green Party was moving almost next doorfrom Spartacus Books, where we were having the FreeGeek meeting, but didn’t realize there was going to be two trips, one yesterday, one today. So, after hearing this from Scott Nelson of Indymedia fame, we took off and helped out, even borrowed a dolly from Spartacus.

Turns out it was Adriane Carr‘s office we were helping to move.

So for the last couple of days, I’ve been busy with helping out, I even dragged one of my kids to help put desks together, and during all this the conversation came up of not wanting to toss out some research papers, two boxes of them, so … they are now sitting beside my desk, ready to be compiled as reports on the database of Northern Oracle. YIPPIE!

Thank you so much Adriane! They will be available as I get through them on the Open Databse (http://northernoracle.org)

Wolfe